Where Is Virtual Reality?
Have you ever used Virtual Reality? Whether the big cumbersome headsets in the early 90’s or the sleeker more refined technology of today, chances are you’ve encountered virtual reality in your travels. It was touted as the “next big thing” in computers and was expected to be in every home but it never eventuated. Today I’m going to discuss what virtual reality means for gamers and game developers.
Introduction
I first used virtual reality in 1995 while visiting SegaWorld in London. They had a ride you sat in, donned a virtual reality headset and furiously pressed buttons to win or lose a battle (along with 20 or so other people). I was so excited to finally get to use virtual reality that I took a wrong turn getting on the ride and fell off into the hydraulics. I’m not sure if it was the amazing 3D, head tracking or loss of blood from my injuries but I had an awakening experience. I knew that in the future, we’d all be playing games using virtual reality, and the world would be a better place. Unfortunately, this never happened, but is it too late?
Should it be the “Next Big Thing”?
VR has a number of key features that make it the obvious path for game development in the future:
- Full 3D Immersion – rather than looking at the game world sitting on a monitor that’s sitting in your room you are actually in the world. Even 2D games take up your entire peripheral vision making them immersive.
- True 3D (for free) – Having two images allows a true stereoscopic display of the 3D world
- Head tracking – Most VR headsets have built in head tracking which adds to the immersion. Now you can look at the pre-pubescent kid in counter strike before he headshots you.
- Look cool – Why wear nerdy 3D glasses when you can look like this:
It’s best suited to the following games:
- Flight Sims
- First-Person Shooters
- Racing Games
- Sport Games
VR also opens up the possibility of relaxation and full emersion games that aren’t possible with regular monitors. This might sound a little hippie like, but I can see some great opportunities in games for children in hospitals and rehabilitation from injuries.
In my eyes, these benefits make it the ideal candidate for game development in the future. The current bout of depression leading from the immersion experienced in the “Avatar” movie is proof that even 3D movies are enough to have a greater impact on people (and that some people are fairly weak).
3D movies bring up an interesting stepping stone towards VR. Monitors are now available with high enough refresh rates that 3D glasses can be used to present a 3D image on the screen at 50Hz. This might be an easier sell now that 3D movies are becoming more mainstream. I find it interesting that some people are happy to accept 3D movies as the “next big thing” while dismissing virtual reality as a thing of the past, despite the fact it has much greater qualities.
So why hasn’t Virtual Reality taken off?
There are a few main reasons why Virtual Reality is still not in the mainstream of gaming:
- Price – With the average headset coming in at $1,500USD, this is a lot for an 800×600 display by anyone’s standards. While it is comparable to some larger end monitors it’s still too high for the average gamer. If the price of headsets can come down below $750USD and resolutions can be at least 1024×768 I expect a much larger uptake. That’s certainly the sweet spot for price and resolution for me.
- Vertigo/Eye Strain – Some people have issues focussing on the screens in the virtual reality headset and others suffer from eye strain. Most people should get used to this over time however it might simply mean some people never adopt the technology
- Lack of interest – People just got bored with the idea. For so long we kept hearing about how VR was going to change the world and it never did. A great example of this is the fact that searches for “Virtual Reality” are down 80% since 2004!
Any other crazy thoughts?
What would a blog post from me be without a reference to Microsoft? The ultimate way for virtual reality to take off is for Microsoft to develop the headsets. They make awesome peripherals, have the money to back it and have the console to go along with it. Having both Xbox and PC support virtual reality would be better for gamers, game developers and give Microsoft more of an edge over the competition.
What do you think?
Have you used Virtual Reality before? Did you like it? How much would you be willing to pay and what resolution do you think should be the minimum supported? Many people I’ve spoken to about Virtual Reality think it’s dead, what do you think?
Feed
Subscribe By Email
Twitter
I wanna wear the VR helmet and go around harvesting little sisters.
here is a novell idea how about u go outside n play with real relity
sif
look at me ive been to london.
now that I have read the entire article!
Virtual Reality is about immersion of the senses, all we have really been working on is sight and sound.
What of touch, interaction and feeling the force of your actions (g forces).
The more you add in the mix the realer vr becomes.
watch this space its the future.
I’ve only ever read and watched clips about Virtual Reality technology, especially back when it was starting out and while that concept seems to have taken a back seat, I think that it’s making a comeback in a different form.
On Beyond Tomorrow, back when it ran, they showed off a concept of Augmented Reality. Using a portable getup with a translucent headset, you walked around an old town and using GPS and motion sensing technology to track your position and direction of facing, the headset actually superimposed the older version of the town onto your vision of the current form.
This isn’t the only example of augmented reality as games for the iPhone and DSi use similar technology to take the world around you and place game elements into it using the phone/handheld’s screen to allow you to see the game world as part of your own. It’s not that hard to take that a step further and create a headset that does the same thing on a more immersive scale.
I don’t think that VR is truly dead, just that it’s been put on the backburner for a while until we improve the elements that comprise it and make it affordable to the average consumer.
I had been trying to do VR for a while and I can tell you why it does not take off. The amount of work you have to put in to see something simple is a LOT for daily use. I am now more and more into Augmented Reality not because it is easier to do, but because you dont need amazing amount of equipments.
Hopefully glasses will get cheaper and better. You should check out new Vuzix iwrap. It is much much much better than what I had before.
Check out the TRIMERSION VR Game system.
Some are still available for a pretty low price
[...] (Images via virtualreality, doolwind) [...]
I’ve been waiting for a decent virtual reality headset since the early 90′s. Tried the Vuzix VR920 with it’s $400 price tag… Once cool thing it got right was conserving the battery power by not using my main monitor – everything else was just absolute garbage. The 600×400 resolution is a complete joke – 100% inexcusable. The head tracking was more a gimmick than anything you could ever hope to use in a 1st person shooter, or real time strategy game. While watching movies it got SUPER hot and the screen turns black from the heat in around 30 minutes. Drivers for 3D in video games only worked half the time, and it was hard to adjust the depth of the 3D effect yourself.
Everyone else seems to absolutely love the VR though… personally I want to fire bomb the company that created it.
It was developed over 3-4 years ago… There must be something better out by now!!!
Something portable with a resolution of 1,000×800 at least.
Has anyone seen anything? (That doesn’t require an external monitor of 120Hz) This isn’t rocket science – we do have the technology to make it work. I would gladly pay $800 for a headset that delivered.