<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Doolwind&#039;s Game Coding Blog &#187; steam points</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.doolwind.com/blog/tag/steam-points/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.doolwind.com/blog</link>
	<description>Pragmatic Thoughts On Game Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 08:15:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Would Steam Points Work?</title>
		<link>http://www.doolwind.com/blog/would-steam-points-work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.doolwind.com/blog/would-steam-points-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 02:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doolwind</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Game Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modern Warfare 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[osmos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steam points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valve]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doolwind.com/blog/?p=254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steam&#8217;s having great success at the moment, with 40% market share making it the #1 platform for online game distribution.  They&#8217;ve expanded from in-house games to publishing titles of all shapes and sizes (from Modern Warfare 2 to Osmos).  I&#8217;ve always thought they were missing something, Steam Points.  Steam Points would be to Steam as Microsoft [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.doolwind.com/images/blog/steampoints.jpg"><img class="alignright" title="Steam Points" src="http://www.doolwind.com/images/blog/steampoints.jpg" alt="" width="251" height="82" /></a>Steam&#8217;s having great success at the moment, with 40% market share making it the #1 platform for online game distribution.  They&#8217;ve expanded from in-house games to publishing titles of all shapes and sizes (from <a href="http://modernwarfare2.infinityward.com/games.php">Modern Warfare 2</a> to <a href="http://www.hemispheregames.com/osmos/">Osmos</a>).  I&#8217;ve always thought they were missing something, Steam Points.  Steam Points would be to Steam as Microsoft Points are to Xbox.  This entry discusses why this would be a valuable addition for Valve, developers, gamers and even retailers.</p>
<p><span id="more-254"></span></p>
<p><strong>Features</strong></p>
<p>Steam Points could be used to buy games, Downloadable Content and even in-game assets (through micro-transactions).  They open up the option of gift cards rather than buying a specific game for someone.  This would be perfect leading up to Christmas as non-game savvy friends and family could buy gift cards rather than guessing and thinking &#8220;Diaper Dash&#8221; is something you&#8217;d enjoy.</p>
<p>All payment would still go through PayPal keeping the security burden on them.  Keeping payment with PayPal also stops Valve from watering down their focus by becoming a merchant facility.  It will simply give gamers more options with how they buy their games.</p>
<p><strong>Advantages for Valve</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Create new revenue sources &#8211; gift cards and      micro-transactions</li>
<li>Encourage micro-transactions within games,      increasing revenue</li>
<li>Bringing more developers and gamers to their      platform</li>
<li>Another differentiator to their competitors      (not that they really need one)</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Advantages for Developers</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>A new revenue source</li>
<li>Revenue during the life-time of the game rather      than only at the point of sale</li>
<li>Reduce barriers for customers as the initial      cost of the game can be lower</li>
<li>Micro-transactions allow more styles of games      to be developed</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Advantages for Gamers</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Using a trust company for purchasing      points.  Valve isn&#8217;t going bust any      time soon</li>
<li>Initial cost of games will be lower, increasing the      number of games a player can afford</li>
<li>More options for how players want to play (pay      for convenience)</li>
<li>Can purchase points at a retailer removing the      need for a credit card</li>
<li>Unifies the currency leading to less confusion for the international market</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Advantages for Retailers</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Gives them a simple avenue into online      distribution</li>
<li>Can sell cards in their shops and make a cut of      online sales</li>
<li>Game retailers may resist however it&#8217;s similar      to &#8220;iTunes credit&#8221; which most music shops now sell</li>
</ul>
<p><strong> Conclusion</strong></p>
<p>Whether you love or hate Steam, it&#8217;s here to stay.  I see a lot of great opportunity for Valve in the future and Steam Points are a great way to begin their move forward.  Some people I&#8217;ve discussed this with are against the idea as they already see Valve as having a monopoly over online distribution.  What do you think?  Would you be happy to start spending Steam Points to buy your games and make micro-transaction?  Should other platforms like Impulse use this system to differentiate themselves?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.doolwind.com/blog/would-steam-points-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

